Day 2- On Dangerous Beauty

9780199731602We began today with a discussion of Ruby Blondell’ book Helen of Troy: Beauty,Myth, Devastation.  We spent the morning parsing the relationship between women’s beauty, danger, lack of control, erotic desire and power.  Is the model of erotic power coming to an end with the pluralization of genders?- asked our leader, David Konstan.

Topics, again, ranged far and wide, all circling around an amorphous organizing mirage of beauty:
jealousy and the Greeks (not really an emotion of interest for them)
Menander’s comedies and the recognition of children
Aristophanes’ play on women taking over the government
Interesting point in Greco-Roman drama/comedy: if I girl references only a mother, this flags that she is a prostitute since no father or brother is there to “protect” her!
seeing goddesses and women naked and what that means
Beauty and ugliness in dance: Martha Graham rebelling against hegemonic notions of dance beauty
heroines in 19th century opera: free women alswyas end badly
The Femme Fatale–this generated quite a lot of discussion in terms of which movies introduce and define what a femme fatale is. Apparently there is a site to instruct one on becoming a femme fatale.  You judge its accuracy:  http://www.wikihow.com/Be-a-Femme-Fatale

So who is the femme fatale?

Everyone agreed that Lamarr counted.  While a case was made for Bergman, I am less certain. And while Monroe is definitely the sex image of the 50s, she was not a femme fatale.

After a morning saturated with attention to women, the afternoon session took us in a slightly different direction.  Themes included:
Veiling and control
nature: European vs. American ideals
Beauty and sublimity
Nature as conquest vs nature as aesthetic object
ruins and the curious reconstruction of older villages to be memories of a bygone era (nostalgia?  Fake or real?)
A brief and regretfully lost thread on the Parthenon, Elgin Marbles, beauty, historicity.

parthenon

 

One of our group shared a double-sided page of quotes that he uses in a seminar on taste.  Disembodied quotes never quite work for me unless they are self-contained enough to situate their meaning.  But several of the quotes worked quite well to prompt some reflections:

“If artworks are answers to their own questions, they themselves thereby truly become questions.”

“There is no art that does not contain in itself as an element, negated,of what it repulses.” Theodor Adorno, Aesthetic Theory (1970)

0622So, I end today’s commentary snapshot with a reference from another participant who I believe put her finger on the quintessential example for the day, Alban Berg’s Lulu.  Lulu represented the fatal attraction of women and the decadent response of unbridled power and violence in men.  This review offers a fascinating analysis of the opera and its time.  lulu

 

 

 

Day 1 at Beauty

OK, in only the first day we talked about:
beauty of boys
sex and beauty
colors and the mystical number of 7 as determining the number of colors in the rainbow
aesthetic categories of zany, cute, interesting (our contemporary impoverished vocab)
beauty and the blind
movies about blind people and valuing the aesthetic
words for women (way too many to number here but mostly depressing)
homosexuality and the hybrid word itself [Greek and Roman]
A.E. Houseman and weirdo Oxbridge dons [whole slew of them, one suspects]:            homosexuality and exoticism
evolutionary ideas of beauty and why they may miss the important point
peacocks
advertising and beauty: metrosexual, androgynous, constraints on women beauty
beauty of older individuals: is it becoming a trend?  My quick answer: NO
bears, otters, hirsute vs. hairless men
art, history, social movements
Kant (let’s not forget him!) and Plato
language

So then I went out to walk the streets of Greenwich Village and Soho and encountered beauty in many human and nonhuman forms: –people (of course, but so varied), dogs (love ’em), buildings (look up!), and the grand theater that is Manhattan where everyone is acting in some fashion or other.  OK, me included.

Pictures would be included but the internet is hating me right now.  Not beautiful, NYUguest…

Today’s musical commentary–which I can recall learning when I was 17 and 20 was far far away from me.  Alas.